Alfredo Perez vs Kody Pearson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: In the past half-year, Perez has a slight edge with a 42.75% success rate, compared to Pearson's 39.82%. Could this be a decisive factor? Possibly, as it often correlates with match prediction accuracy.
• Return Game Stats: Pearson outshines Perez by winning 49.06% of opponent's second serve points and 31.86% of first serve returns, compared to Perez's 43.9% and 23.65%. Does this give Pearson the upper hand in returning serve? Likely, as these numbers are significant in determining match favorites.
• Under Pressure Analysis: Perez is slightly better under pressure, saving 50.28% of breakpoints compared to Pearson's 45.63%. Could this impact in-game betting predictions? Quite possibly.
• Overall Performance: Over the past twelve months, Perez has a superior win percentage of 69.86%, while Pearson has managed 46.88%. Does this suggest a consistent winning pattern for Perez? Yes.
• Preferred Surface: Perez excels on hard courts, with a 65% win rate, whereas Pearson performs best on grass with a 55% rate. Might surface preference determine match outcomes? Depends on the surface played, but favors Perez on hard.
• Player Level: Over the last year on the $10K ITF circuit, Perez recorded a 73.81% win rate, surpassing Pearson's 53.85%. Does tournament level influence their competitiveness? Absolutely.
• Head-to-Head Record: Perez leads their H2H 1-0, with their last victory at the Winnipeg Challenger on hard courts. Does past performance suggest Perez's dominance? Yes.
• Opponent Quality: Perez has faced players with an average rank of 381.37, while Pearson's opponents averaged 184.44. Does this mean Pearson has faced tougher competition? Indeed.
• Deciding Set Performance: If this match goes to a deciding set, Perez seems more reliable, having won 67% over the past year compared to Pearson's 56%. Could this be pivotal in a tight contest? Certainly.
• Break Point Conversion: Pearson edges out with a 34.12% conversion rate, slightly better than Perez's 31.01%. Could this be crucial during breakpoint moments? Definitely a factor.

Editorial Prediction (July 6, 2025, UTC):

In analyzing the key statistics, several aspects favor Perez. Despite facing opponents of lower average ranking, Perez maintains a strong win percentage, indicating a consistent performance in matches across the board. Perez also has a historical edge in head-to-head matchups, further enhancing their psychological advantage.

However, Pearson demonstrates strength in returning games and converting break points, areas that could trouble Perez if Pearson capitalizes effectively. Perez’s record in deciding sets, though, shows a potential resilience that could prove crucial in a tightly contested match.

The matchup is on hard court, historically a strong surface for Perez, giving them a probable edge. It appears that while Pearson can challenge effectively, the overall metrics and past performance suggest Perez is the likely winner in this upcoming encounter.